jump to navigation

Why Obama? Israel/Palestine July 23, 2008

Posted by Alien Drums in Politics.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

The New York Times reported today:

“Mr. Obama said that the capital of Israel should be Jerusalem, but added that the matter should be settled through a negotiation by the parties.

“ ‘That’s an issue that has to be dealt with by the parties involved, the Palestinians and the Israelis, and it is not the job of the United States to dictate the form in which that will take,’ Mr. Obama said, ‘but rather to support the efforts that are being made right now to resolve these very difficult issues that have a long history.’ ”

The U.S. can’t dictate, but we can support. Excellent!

Why Obama? Iraq timetable July 21, 2008

Posted by Alien Drums in Politics.
Tags: ,
add a comment

The New York Times today:

“President Bush agreed to ‘a general time horizon’ for withdrawing American troops in Iraq, the White House announced Friday, in a concession that reflected both progress in stabilizing Iraq and the depth of political opposition to an open-ended military presence in Iraq and at home.”

In other words, Sen. Obama was right all along. Kudos again to the Illinois senator.

Why Obama? Afghanistan July 20, 2008

Posted by Alien Drums in Politics.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

The forgotten front fortunately is being remembered. This is APs characterization today of Sen. Obama’s position on Afganistan:

“Obama has made Afghanistan a centerpiece of his proposed strategy for dealing with terrorism threats. The Illinois senator has said the war in Afghanistan, where Taliban and al-Qaida-linked militants are resurgent, deserves more troops and more attention as opposed to the conflict in Iraq. Both Obama and his Republican rival for the presidency, Sen. John McCain, advocate sending more forces to the country.”

Excellent! The focus should have been on Afghanistan all along. Irag diverted our attention from the real task of fighting terrorism. Both Sens. Obama and McCain get it, but McCain made the shift as a follower of Obama–my words, of course, not his.

Why Obama? July 19, 2008

Posted by Alien Drums in Politics.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

I generally wait later in the election process to make my decision, but I’m pretty sure this time that I’m going with Barack Obama. Why? I’m not totally sure. Something is special about this man, and some things have changed inside me.

As for him, it’s not just how he speaks; it’s what he says. The stuff about change does not grab me at all. Change is neither good nor bad in and of itself. There is good change and there is bad change, and sometimes we can’t provide the proper anaylsis regarding the goodness or badness of a change until after some time has passed.

I do resonate with bringing hope to people who have little hope on the economic or social side of things. As a spiritual person, I find my greatest and most lasting hope beyond the realm of the political and believe that is where all genuine hope is found. But our government should provide a sense of hope within its realm of influence. We should have reason to hope that wars can be avoided if at all possible. We should have reason to hope that we can improve our personal or family economic position if we work hard and are frugal. We should have reason to hope that the judicial system will, in fact, be just. The most economically and socially deprived should, in the United States, be able to have hope in a better tomorrow.

And now about the change inside of me. I’m officially a Republican; I believe in individual freedom and in the importance of a free-market system. I also believe in government restraint; that it cannot solve every problem, that individual responsibility is important. That has not changed. But I also care deeply about the down and outs of society; I care because Jesus cared. I thought a “compassionate conservativism” could deliver on all fronts; I am now having my doubts. Caring for the least of these is more important than caring for the rich and richer.

Another thing also has happened; I’ve realized that my pro-life position isn’t being advanced by electing so-called pro-life candidates. I haven’t made abortion a trump issue in my choices, but it has been very important; and it hasn’t made any difference. I’ve sacrificed a lot of other caring and life-honoring positions in my desire to drastically limit abortions. It simply hasn’t mattered much, so it doesn’t make sense to make that the most important issue in making my choice of candidates. I’m still pro-life and believe a woman’s right to an abortion should be more severely limited in order to protect the rights of the child, especially those that have reached the stage of sustainable life.

So, enough said of a general sort. I recognize that I need to get specific about issues so that I can either better explain for support for Obama or change to support McCain.

Loving Gore’s challenge July 18, 2008

Posted by Alien Drums in Environment.
Tags: ,
add a comment

“We’re borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Persian Gulf to burn it in ways that destroy the planet. Every bit of that has to change.” — Al Gore, quoted in The New York Times

Mr. Gore is doing our political system a great service. He is standing apart from the campaign battle in order to raise broader issues. His latest challenge is commendable — to move the entire U.S. energy grid to a carbon-free approach in 10 years. Even supporters of the direction question the timetable, but it conveys the urgency of this need for change.

There are two basic challenges–technological and political. I suspect the latter is the bigger.

Here are a couple of paragraphs from The New York Times story that I loved:

Like a modern Jeremiah, Mr. Gore called down thunder to justify the spending of trillions of dollars to remake the American power system, a plan fraught with technological and political challenges that goes far beyond the changes recently debated in Congress and by world leaders.

“The survival of the United States of America as we know it is at risk,” he said in a midday speech to a friendly crowd of mostly young supporters in Washington. “And even more — if more should be required — the future of human civilization is at stake.”