System of belief vs. redemptive life July 26, 2007
Posted by Alien Drums in Bible, Christianity, Emerging church, Postmodern, Scripture, Theology.7 comments
I sent this quote to a family member recently:
Brian McLaren:
“When Christian faith presents itself as a system of belief, postmodern people are often skeptical. But when it presents itself as a redemptive way of life within human history, they see something unique and hopeful.”
He responded with the following:
“Our Christian faith is both a system of beliefs and a way of life. My question for Maclaren is this: Is it not our beliefs that determine how we live and think and act? Postmodern people, including myself at times, tend to believe in all sorts of things that are contrary to the word of God. And at the same time they (we) try to live a “redemptive life” that will hopefully, in the end, outweigh a life of unbelief. Redemptive living cannot be a substitue for a right believing in, and knowing of, God.
“Redemptive living is a necessary result of walking and talking and trusting Jesus and His word.”
And here’s my response:
I think the problem is not “belief,” it’s “system.” Modern, rationalistic man has done something that Christ, a premodern, did not seek to do; modern man sought to systematize belief, to construct a logical system of A+B=C. This systematizing effort actually began much before modernity but Jesus did not do it. He almost completely used story (his own and the one’s he told). Story is a great way to convey truth but it is not a systematized way of conveying truth. When you start to try to organize and systematize you almost invariably change it because you are trying to connect dots that previously were not connected. Not systemization can be helpful because it helps us organize our thinking, but we need to recognize that the act of putting it into a system changes the message.
Regarding your question: “Is it not our beliefs that determine how we live and think and act?” Here’s how I would approach it: Some would say how you live and think and act actually reflect what you believe. That is true in a sense, but I’m reminded of Paul in Romans saying that he did what he did not want to do and didn’t do the things he wanted to. I believe the Fall has produced an inconsistency within men and women that distorts the easy connection between beliefs and actions. Most believers would affirm that believers do in fact still sin. In other words, even though they believe it’s wrong to sin, they (we) still sin. If their actions reflect what they truly believe, then they’re not a Christian because they did not trust Christ in that circumstance. As a result, you cannot be absolute about that. I think you can say that the difference between your beliefs and your actions create a discontinuity in life that causes great spiritual and mental discomfort. Which reminds me of the old quote about not resting until we rest in Thee.
You said postmodern people tend to believe in all sorts of things that are contrary to the Word of God. Of course, that is not isolated to postmodern people; modernists are just as contrary. But the difficulty is the “contrary to the Word of God” part. That is stated as if it is an established fact. The reality is not so simple. Many believing modernists and postmodernists disagree on what the Word of God teaches. For instance, people used to use that very phrase to justify slavery and then racial discrimination. Now, we think that is ridiculous, but those Christians who once believed that thought Scripture was clear in that regard. It’s because they looked at Scripture through a cultural window and found what they wanted to find. That tendency has been there throughout the history of the church, and so I suspect that you and I are susceptible to that same tendency. What seems obvious to us is not so obvious to people of other times, places or cultural perspectives.
Now, we can take Jesus’ words to the bank: “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten son. …” But we still have to interpret what that means to us today. That may seem easy, but it’s not. The first step is trying to understand what the original Greek words that were written down mean because, as you know, every translation is an interpretation. (Plus there’s another translation that has taken place — Aramaic to Greek — that scholars can only speculate about.) To understand the words requires comparisons to other texts, biblical and non-bibilical, that use the words. Once you have a pretty good grasp of what the words and phrases and sentences mean, then you start having to compare them with the other words of Christ to see how they might work together; then you compare them with other scriptural teachings on the same topic and again try to understand how they relate. Of course, there are seeming contradictions. Well, in fact, there are some genuine contradictions but they are not that critical. In trying to deal with the seeming contradictions you must employ another level of interpretation. And then you look at what other Christians have said through history and how they have interpreted those passages. More interpretation.
So, while it’s easy to say “contrary to the Word of God,” that’s a really fuzzy statement; and well-meaning, “orthodox,” believing experts and spiritual giants through the years have interpreted Scripture differently. While I might say that some things McLaren and other postmodernists might believe appear to be contrary to Scripture, I could say the same thing about any Christian thinker. I am using my interpretation of Scripture to say that.
Of course, this doesn’t even begin to deal with one’s basic approach to Scripture. Everything I just said can be said about people who approach Scripture as God’s unique, authoritative, even inerrant Word of God. If you don’t say any or all of those things then you open yourself to even more possible interpretations.
I don’t think McLaren is saying that redemptive living is a substitute for belief; he’s saying that redemptive living is what attracts others to our Savior. If faith in Christ has changed us, redeemed our lives, then others have hope that it can redeem their lives, as well. As in the early church, what really attracted people to Christ was the fact that believers loved one another and that it showed itself in outward ways.
Short question, long response. Great to hear from you. I pray for you every day because, like Christ, I love you. Blessings.
Driving in the fog February 22, 2007
Posted by Alien Drums in Christianity, Emerging church, Faith, Postmodern, Religion.Tags: Planning, Strategic planning
5 comments
Driving in the fog is dangerous. Living in a fog can be dangerous, too. But is it all that bad?
Yesterday, the fog was pretty heavy when I started for work. It was not terrible fog, but it was not drive-as-fast-as-normal fog either.
I took my time. I focused. No radio. No distractions. Concentrating in the moment. There’s something a bit intense about driving in the fog. You don’t get sleepy. You’re alert.
So what about living in a fog? I’m not talking about a mental fog; I’m talking about moving forward without being able to see clearly what is ahead of you. It’s a pretty good way to live. You take your time. You focus. You live in the moment.
We seem to be a culture caught up in planning, and the ultimate expression of planning the “road” ahead is this corporate nonsense about developing mission and vision statements and all such consultant-contrived devices. I say corporate nonsense because that’s where it had its genesis, but it has taken over churches and religious institutions and even individual lives.
In churches and institutions, my experience has shown that more energy is put into “strategic” statements than in actually getting anything done. We’ve swallowed the planning Kool-aid; and when you swallow the Kool-aid, you end up buying the farm. (Check Jonestown reference to Kool-aid somewhere.)
Astrophysicist Alar Toomre may have a helpful word for us. He tries to make headway in his research by focusing on the little issues, not the big ones.
Denise Shekerjian, in her book Uncommon Genius, paraphrases Toomre’s approach this way: “What is important is to focus your interests on one or two discrete, localized, particularized questions pulled out from a universe of one’s interests. Work on the small matters utterly, he explains, and the large necessities can be left to take care of themselves and of those who trusted accordingly.” (p. 10)
That sounds like good old fashion work. Maybe we need a little more work and a little less strategic planning in our individual lives, our church lives and our institutional lives. Because, it sure seems to me, that we’re not getting much done.
Let’s drive in the fog a little and live in the moment.
Goodness across religious lines February 11, 2007
Posted by Alien Drums in Christianity, Postmodern, Religion, Spirituality, Truth.2 comments
“I feel that my goal in life is to help people love God and to know Jesus, not to hate the Buddha or disrespect Muhammad.” (Neo in Brian McLaren’s A New Kind of Christian, p. 60)
I love that. Neo continues:
“…[W]hen it comes to other religions, the challenge in modernity was to prove that we’re right and they’re wrong. But I think we have a different challenge in postmodernity. The question isn’t so much whether we’re right but whether we’re good. And it strieks me that goodness, not just rightness, is what Jesus said the real issue was–you know, good trees produce good fruit, that sort of thing. …
“I’m not in any way saying truth isn’t important. But I am saying that truth means more than factual accuracy. It means being in sync with God.”
Do you ever get the feeling that you have more in common with people from other religions than with people from your own? And do you ever feel like the things that repel you are exhibited in your religion and in that of others?
In other words, you find people who love God and people in different religions, and you find people who are willing to resort to mental and physical violence to defend their theological or philosophical position no matter what religion or philosophy they espouse.
Turning on lights January 20, 2007
Posted by Alien Drums in Christianity, Emerging church, Postmodern, Scripture, Theology, Truth.Tags: Southern Baptists
2 comments
We turn on lights so easily today that I think we fail to see the miraculous in it. Let me state the obvious. Enter a room with no light and you cannot see what is there. Flip the switch and what was there all along is now visible.
That’s how I feel in my spiritual life right now. God is helping me to turn on a light switch and see what has been in the “room” all along. The light is coming from looking at Scripture in a different way. Rather than mining it for theological truth; I’m trying to let the story speak. I find myself wondering, is systematic theology the greatest enemy of genuine godwardness?
Some years ago I began to explore Calvinism because of its growing influence in Southern Baptist circles, of which I was then a part. Calvinism, as a theological system, is very compelling; and Calvin himself is even more compelling.
I told a Calvinist friend of mine that if you’re going to be an inerrantist you almost have to be a Calvinist. I also did some doctoral work at a conservative Presbyterian seminary. In one of the papers I discussed free will regarding some target. I stated that free will, while not explicitly stated in Scripture, is inferred. I made an “A” on the paper, but the professor wrote a note indicating he didn’t buy the argument.
Calvinism makes so much systematic, logical, biblical, modern sense; but I think it’s ultimately flawed. If God had wanted us to have a systematic theology on which to build our faith, I think he would have given us one. So, you say, maybe he has in the centuries since the biblical record was written. Well that doesn’t help because there are so many variations on theology.
No, I think God wants our understanding of Him to be a bit mushy, hard to nail down. That’s why his most important revelation, Jesus, was a living story.
People who want structure in their lives, including mental and theological structure, cannot abide this. Those who want God in their lives can if that’s what God intended and intends.
Where’s the authority? January 13, 2007
Posted by Alien Drums in Bible, Christianity, Emerging church, Postmodern, Scripture, Uncategorized.16 comments
“What if the real issue is not the authority of the text … but rather the authority of God? …”
Now Brian McLaren is challenging me, not speaking for me. I have been rather proud of stressing the authority of Scripture as opposed to those who stress its supposed inerrancy. But McLaren’s words didn’t remain a challenge long. The truth was instantly apparent.
Of course, by moving authority away from real words on real paper, belief can and will get more mushy, more pliable. Those who are personally wired to need concrete theological handles to hold onto will find this mushiness untenable. It’s much harder to “win” an argument when one views authority as resting beyond the wholly tangible.
This, my inerrantist friends would argue, is a slippery slope on which there is no solid theological footing, that relativism lies at the foot of that slope. They are probably right about the slippery slope, but what will one slide into — falsehood or truth. History is rife with people “climbing” toward the wrong goal. What if most of the Christian church has been “climbing” away from God instead of toward him.
Or to change the metaphor, what if we’ve been heading along a slope that heads downward instead of upward, that by slipping we will turn around and grab the lifeline that is being thrown to us from on high and behind. Instead of walking away from God down our own slope of comfortable religion we allow God to pull us up to him.
I’m not sure if that metaphor works. I need to think.
I end with a quote from the rest of McLaren’s paragraph in A New Kind of Christian, with Neo speaking.
“What if the issue isn’t a book that we can misinterpret with amazing creativity but rather the will of God, the intent of God, the desire of God, the wisdom of God–maybe we could say the kingdom of God?” (p. 51)
Dancing dinosaurs January 12, 2007
Posted by Alien Drums in Christianity, Emerging church, Postmodern, Truth.2 comments
“… [T]here are some of us dinosaurs out there who want to learn to dance.”
The fictional character Neo speaks those words to a group of college Christians in Brian McLaren’s book, A New Kind of Christian. Again, McLaren speaks for me. A bunch of years ago I started writing some short stories about my life, and I called them “A Dinosaur Speaks.” I was speaking of myself as religious and cultural dinosaur in the midst of world that seemed increasingly different. I say that to establish my identity as a dinosaur. (I also discovered later that C.S. Lewis used the term.)
The reality is that I was rather proud of my dinosaur status. Maybe T Rex and friends were rather proud of their status as the kingpins of creation shortly before their extension. Reminds one that pride goes before the fall.
I don’t want to fall. I don’t want to invest my short life in seeking to sustain a religious and cultural perspective that is out of touch with the world and time in which God has inserted me.
Let me quote the part in McLaren’s book that appear right before the quote I started this with. Neo is speaking.
“Well, much as it might surprise you, I think a lot of my peers when I was in college were going in this direction [toward postmodernity]. I think that maybe 30 to 40 percent of my baby boom cohorts were leaning into postmodernity. The majority were thoroughly modern. I think the great economy of the 1980s managed to convert most of my secular postmodern friends from my generation back to modernity; money has a lot of power to influence the way people think, right? As for those in the church, well, as you say, one just can’t talk about this sort of thing among most older folks, so if there are any older people thinking this way, they tend to keep quiet about it.” (p. 44)
I’m one of those Neo spoke about. It’s why this blog is basically anonymous, for now. I’m exploring. I’m thinking. But exploring and thinking make some Christians uncomfortable.
Maybe I’m on the right track because Jesus definitely made people uncomfortable, and He is still doing it today.